No. 25-6244

Tasleema Yasin v. VM Master Issuer, LLC

Lower Court: Georgia
Docketed: 2025-11-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts appellate-review due-process electronic-filing equal-protection first-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2026-01-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause is violated when a timely notice of appeal is denied solely because of the State's malfunctioning mandatory electronic filing system

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment ’s Due Process Clause is violated when a timely notice of appeal is denied solely because of the State ’s malfunctioning mandatory electronic filing system. 2. Whether Equal Protection is violated when litigants are treated differently based solely on random technological failures in State systems. 3. Whether the fundamental right of access to courts prohibits a State from extinguishing appellate review due to government-created technical barriers. 4. Whether adverse judicial treatment of a litigant's constitutional objections constitutes retaliation in violation of the First Amendment ’s Petition Clause. II.

Docket Entries

2026-01-26
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 17, 2026, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2026-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/23/2026.
2025-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2025)

Attorneys

Tasleema Yasin
Tasleema Yasin — Petitioner
Tasleema Yasin — Petitioner