1. WHETHER THE 8TH CIRCUIT ERRED FINDING THAT REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTED JUSTIFYING THE STOP OF PETITIONER'S VEHICLE AND MISAPPLYING RODRIGUEZ ON WHETHER OR NOT THE TRAFFIC STOP WAS IMPROPERLY EXTENDED.

2. WHETHER THE 8TH CIRCUIT ERRED BY AFFIRMING THE TRIAL COURT'S ADMISSION OF HEARSAY STATEMENTS UNDER F.R.E. 801(d)(2)(E).

3. WHETHER THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE TRIAL COURT'S ADMISSION OF PETITIONER'S PRIOR CONVICTION IN KANSAS PURSUANT TO F.R.E. 404(b)(1).

Whether the 8th Circuit erred in finding reasonable suspicion for a vehicle stop, misapplying Rodriguez, and admitting hearsay statements and prior convictions under Federal Rules of Evidence