1. Does The Court uphold the lower court 's current authority and decisions ordered by the powerful legal system (relying on Insurance Company paid reports and misuse of power), over the legitimate medical authority (with educated best practices committed to the wellbeing of injured licensed Nurses).

2. Whether The Court awards pro se equal rights to be heard via petition and oral argument (historical discriminatory practices and prejudices are built into the system to favor legally trained over medically educated individuals).

3. Whether it is legal under Federal Law that Seriously Injured Nurses are forced back to work Acutely Injured and Acutely Traumatized suffering added pain, with full disregard of staffs serious signs and symptoms.

4. Whether The Court federally upholds and will mandate litigation stress as compensable Nationally for lengthy and damaging unnecessary litigation caused by the W.C. system.

5. Whether the online publication of inaccurate lower court and appellate court decisions, along with the disclosure of private, identifiable medical information, constitutes a violation of privacy under HIPAA and defamation of character when such information is falsified, degrading, or harmful, and accessible to the public through a simple online search.

6. Whether W.C. standards are "adequate " (needing further definition) if violation of Federal Rights and Civil Liberties exist under the Worker 's Compensation System.

7. Whether the court holds lower court decisions/patterns of inaccurate arbitrary dates, perpetuated by fraudulent doctor documentation, as just, when irrefutable evidence is committed and permanent injuries occurred.

8. Whether a lower court 's decision can contradict this court when it is based on misrepresentation of intent, distortion of the factual record, and a disregard for irrefutable evidence, thereby raising serious concerns about the misuse of judicial power and denial of due process.

9. Whether state judicial bodies, including workers' compensation appellate tribunals and state supreme courts, are required to adhere to federal workers' compensation laws and precedents, or whether they are permitted to apply divergent interpretations that conflict with national standards and federal statutes.

10. Whether the court has the authority to vacate or modify decisions made by administrative law judges in the workers' compensation system when those decisions are based on misrepresentation, fraud, or other material misdeeds, and whether the petitioner is entitled to a favorable and compensatory award under such circumstances.

11. Whether an Unlicensed ALJ has authority and competency (Rule 605) to claim that a Licensed Maine R.N. is not able to determine whether or not his/her serious symptoms are resolved on arbitrary date of Sept. 13, 2011 when all evidence proves otherwise & 'number pf nightmares ' is not an effective medical tool of evaluation.

Whether the court can review lower court decisions in a workers' compensation case involving alleged judicial misconduct, medical rights, and potential federal law violations