Whether the state can replace a jury verdict without another jury trial; whether the petitioner was denied due process; whether state courts decided proceedings unreasonably; whether there should be a limit on misdemeanor enhancement to life sentence; whether there is a limit on using prior convictions to enhance an offense

"WHETHER PETITIONER HAD RECEIVED "WHETHER THE STATE CAN REPLACE A JURY VERDICT WITHOUT HAVING ANOTHER JURY TRIAL?" "WHETHER THE PETITIONER WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS OF LAW IN HIS STATE COURT PROCEE DINGS?" "WHETHER THE STATE COURTS DECIDE PETITIONER'S COURT PROCEEDINGS UNREASONABLY AS WOULD BE FOUND IN THE FEDERAL AND UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OR IS THIS CASE A CASE OF FIRST IMPRESSION?" "WHETHER THERE SHOULD BE A LIMIT ON HOW MANY TIMES AN OFFENSE THAT STARTS AS A MISDEMEANOR IS ENHANCED TO A PUNISHMENT OF A FIRST DEGREE LIFE SENTENCE?" "WHETHER A LIMIT ON HOW MANY TIMES A PRIOR CONVICTION CAN BE USED IN A ONE COURT PROCEEDING TO ENHANCE AN OFFENSE?" ii