No. 25-6770

Heath W. Gray v. Pennsylvania Department of State

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2026-02-10
Status: Pending
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: first-amendment government-redress suffrage supreme-court-certiorari taxation-without-representation voting-rights
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess Patent Privacy
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Would this Honorable High Court please REMAND this suffrage rights appeal to the Pennyslvania Supreme Court to adjudicate my 'No Taxation Without Representation' grievance?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

IN THIS VOTING RIGHTS APPEAL We all know the rally cry of "No Taxation Without Representation" which gave birth to this great nation. Until this case we have never asked a court of law to determine which taxpa ying citizens this principle applies to here in America. Our forefathers wanted to be fairly represented in the government they invested in through taxation just as I do here today. Many of us know the biblical teaching of a righteous father who would not give his son a serpent if he asked for a fish. Similarly, when a taxpaying citizen petitions his government for a redress of his grievances in accord with his first amendment right, he does not expect his government to avoid his grievance of "No Taxation Without Representation", and disingenuously evade rendering a ruling on this fundamental value judgement that our democratic republic was bom from. This decision is not the fish I asked for from our honorable government. All I ask is, if I am going to be denied, please, deny me on the merits in which I framed my argument.. Unless this United States Supreme Court would choose to exercise its authority to grant certiorari, appoint counsel, hear arguments, and render a fair decision on this "No Taxation Without Representation" voting rights appeal, I humbly ask just one question. Question Would this Honorable High Court, please REMAND this suffrage rights appeal to the Pennyslvania Supreme Court to adjudicate my "No Taxation Without Representation" grievance? ii PARTIES TO THIS PROCEEDING The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 801 City-County Building 414 Grant Street Pittsburgh, PA 15219-2410 Ph# 412-565-2816 Respondent: Pennsylvania Department of State 302 North Office Building Harrisburg, PA 17120 Ph# 717-787-6458 Attorney for Respondent: Brett Thomas Graham Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General 1600 Arch St., Suite 300 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Ph# 856-465-2868 Related Cases 2 WAP 2025 Pennsylvania Supreme Court 442 MD 2023 Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Pro se Appellant Heath W. GrayFP-0237 PA/DOC, SCI GREENE 175 Progress Drive Waynesburg, PA 15370 iii a: ■

Docket Entries

2025-12-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 12, 2026)

Attorneys

Heath W. Gray
Heath W. Gray — Petitioner
Heath W. Gray — Petitioner