Whether testimony by a 'peer review' pathologist who did not perform the original autopsy violates the Confrontation Clause when the original pathologist is unavailable

A forensic pathologist who performed an autopsy on a homicide victim was unavailable for trial. In her place, the State of Georgia offered testimony by a “peer review” pathologist who did not participate in the autopsy but testified as to the results based on her review of the autopsy report . Does the surrogate’s oral recitation of testimonial hearsay from an unadmitted autopsy report violate the Confrontation Clause?