THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SHOULD HAD HEARD
KENNETH COLVIN, JR.'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (RULE 60(d) MOTION)
BASED ON FRAUD UPON THE COURT, AND NOT SENT THE MOTION TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS AS A REQUEST FOR A SUCCESSIVE HABEAS CORPUS
PETITION, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §2244

THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SHOULD HAD
TRANSFERRED KENNETH COLVIN, JR'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
(RULE 60(d) MOTION) BACK TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TO
HAVE THAT COURT RE-OPEN HIS ORIGINAL HABEAS CORPUS CASE BASED
03 FRAUD UPON THE COURT

Whether a district court erred in treating a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment based on fraud upon the court as a successive habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. §2244 rather than addressing it on the merits