WHETHER OR NOT THESE WAS SUFFZCZENT EVIDENCE 7b
SUPPORT ADKINS CONSPzRACN (HNVTCTZDN AS TO BOTH FENTANYL
AND MARIJUANA CoNSZSTANT ]HTTH THE ZZ977 ANA FOURTEENTH
Amendment 's i

a). WHETHER OR NoT THE DISTRICT COUPE AND THE CEJPE of
APPEALS FOE THE FOURTH CZRCUZT ERRoEED EN CqnCeJDZNE THAT
ADKENS WAS PFbPEFLY SENTENCED RACED UPON THE EVIDENCE
ANA DENTZNC HIM l/AEEOUS SEN/ENCENC GUjDELZA/ES AEAUCTEOHS
AND INHETHE/L OTL MOT HIT SENTENCE WAS S(JESTANTZUElN
reasonable aoH Longee than hecessaet to satestt /$ us^sss^

3 WHETNEL OE HOT THE CDUTET OF APPEALS FOE THE FOURTH
CEPCUZZ EHAO/2EB ENETS FEVDENG THAT THEDESTAECT EF
PAsSAEAVf CALCULATED ATHENS CRENENAE HSSTOAF INHERE THE
l/A. CODE ZoW) WM REPEALED EH EM

Question not identified.