Eula Winfrey v. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office
ARE DOCTORED GOVERMENTAL RECORDS LEGAL AND ADMISSABLE BY PATENT LAW?
ARE FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS PERMISSABLE BY PATENT LAW?
CAN AN APPLICATION CITED AS ' ABANDONED ' BE LAWFULLY ABANDONED WHEN THE APPLICANT IS
DUTIFULLY AND CONSISTENTLY CURRENTLY WORKING FAITHFULLY UPON IT?
HOW CAN AN ABANDONED' APPLICATION BE LEGALLY ABANDONED AND THE USPTO IS CONTINUING
AFTERWARDS TO SEND CORRESPONDENCE WITH MADE UP OFFICE ACTIONS TO THE INVENTOR IN
ORDER TO DECEIVE THEM INTO BELIEVING THAT THEIR APPLICATION IS STILL PENDING, WHEN RECORDS
PROVE THAT THE INVENTOR'S APPLICATION HAS ALREADY BEEN GRANTED TO A MAJOR CORPORATION
WITHOUT THE INVENTOR'S CONSENT OR KNOWLEDGE?
THE INVENTOR HAS SENT THE RECEIPT TO SAID SECOND PATENT APPLICATION PROVING THAT THE
USPTO REMOVED AND DENIED HER SIGNATURES ON BOTH HER PATENT APPLICATIONS DISALLOWING
HER ACCESS TO HER OWN INVENTIONS. SHE HAS BEEN SENT THE ACTUAL RECEIPT OF THE USPTO'S
PILLAGING OF HER INVENTION AND GIVEN TO ONE BY THE NAME OF 'DANIEL WALZMAN' ???
IS THE CONTINUAL REMOVING AND FALSIFYING OF THE INVENTOR'S SIGNATURES LAWFUL??
JOHN WEISS, THE INVENTOR'S FIRST EXAMINER CALLED THE INVENTOR WITH A CALL OF
CONGRATULATIONS FOR A COMPLETED AND GRANTED PATENT APPLICATION AND A JOB WELL DONE.
THE INVENTOR HAS SUBMITTED ACTUAL PROOF OF THIS CELEBRATORY PHONE CALL WITH A WITNESS
AFIDAVIT. WILL THE COURT PLEASE PROCURE HER WITNESS DEPOSTION IMMEDIATELY?
Question not identified.