No. 25-722

Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability, Inc. v. Department of Justice, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2025-12-19
Status: Pending
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law agency-disclosure foia-exemptions government-transparency national-security records-search
Key Terms:
Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2026-02-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does FOIA allow agencies to refuse to confirm or deny the existence of responsive records when invoking statutory exemptions, and may they do so without first searching for such records?

Question Presented (from Petition)

In response to requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regarding potential domestic surveillance abuse, the respondent agencies issued so -called Glomar responses that refuse to confirm or deny the existence of any responsive record on the supposed grounds that doing so would reveal information protected by a FOIA exemption . Worse, the agencies issued those responses without even searching for responsive records. The D.C. Circuit approved the agencies’ searchless Glomar responses on the mistaken theory that FOIA allows agencies to decline even to search for responsive records if the agency believes such records —were they to exist —would be subject to a Glomar response. The question s presented are: 1. Does FOIA allow agencies invoking any of the exemptions in 5 U.S.C. § 552(b), including those not based on national security, to refuse to confirm or deny the existence of any record s responsive to a FOIA request? 2. Assuming FOIA allows such a response, may an agency issue it without first search ing for responsive records to determine whether its concern actually applies to all responsive records and/or whether some can be released in segregated or redacted form?

Docket Entries

2026-01-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-20
Waiver of Dept. of Justice, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2026-01-20
Waiver of right of respondent Dept. of Justice, et al. to respond filed.
2025-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 20, 2026)
2025-10-07
Application (25A393) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 15, 2025.
2025-10-02
Application (25A393) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 16, 2025 to December 15, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Dept. of Justice, et al.
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability, Inc.
Gene Clayton SchaerrSchaerr | Jaffe, Petitioner
Gene Clayton SchaerrSchaerr | Jaffe, Petitioner
Gene Clayton SchaerrSchaerr | Jaffe, Petitioner