No. 25-746

Carvin L. Thomas, et al. v. Roberta Kustoff, Chairman, Tennessee Board of Parole, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-12-23
Status: Pending
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse Waived
Tags: administrative-law constitutional-rights liberty-rights parole-interest procedural-due-process tennessee-law
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2026-01-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a parole applicant in Tennessee have a liberty interest based on the expectation of parole?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1.Does a parole applicant in Tennessee have a liberty interest based on the expectation of parole?

Docket Entries

2026-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 11, 2026.
2026-01-30
Motion of Roberta Kustoff, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
Main Document
2026-01-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 9, 2026 to March 11, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2026-01-09
Response Requested. (Due February 9, 2026)
2025-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
2025-12-29
Waiver of right of respondent Roberta Kustoff, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2025-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2026)
PetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Carvin Thomas, et al.
Paul Andrew Justice III — The Justice Law Office, Petitioner
Paul Andrew Justice III — The Justice Law Office, Petitioner
Roberta Kustoff, et al.
Joshua Daniel Minchin — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
Joshua Daniel Minchin — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent