No. 25-788
Reed Day, et al. v. Ben Henry, in His Official Capacity as Director, Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, et al.
Amici (3)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: alcohol-distribution constitutional-discrimination interstate-commerce state-regulation three-tier-system twenty-first-amendment
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a physical-presence requirement that discriminates between in-state and out-of-state alcohol retailers can be deemed constitutional under the Twenty-first Amendment solely as an essential feature of a State's three-tier system of alcohol distribution, without concrete evidence establishing that the requirement predominantly promotes a legitimate, nonprotectionist interest such as public health or safety
Docket Entries
2026-02-05
Amicus brief of Manhattan Institute and Reason Foundation submitted.
2026-02-05
Brief amici curiae of Manhattan Institute, et al. filed.
2026-02-03
Amicus brief of National Association of Wine Retailers submitted.
2026-02-03
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Wine Retailers filed.
2026-01-16
Brief amici curiae of 39 Wine Consumers filed.
2026-01-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 6, 2026, for all respondents.
2026-01-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 5, 2026 to April 6, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 5, 2026)
Attorneys
39 Wine Consumers
Manhattan Institute and Reason Foundation
Ilya Shapiro — Manhattan Institute, Amicus
Ilya Shapiro — Manhattan Institute, Amicus
National Association of Wine Retailers
Reed Day and Albert Jacobs
State of Arizona