| 25-844 |
Chicago Wine Company, et al. v. Mike Braun, Governor of Indiana, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2026-01-15 |
Pending |
|
alcohol-regulation commerce-clause constitutional-law interstate-commerce physical-presence twenty-first-amendment |
Whether a physical-presence requirement that forbids out-of-state retailers from shipping alcohol directly to in-state consumers unless they establish… |
| 25-788 |
Reed Day, et al. v. Ben Henry, in His Official Capacity as Director, Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2026-01-06 |
Pending |
Amici (3) |
alcohol-distribution constitutional-discrimination interstate-commerce state-regulation three-tier-system twenty-first-amendment |
Whether a physical-presence requirement that discriminates between in-state and out-of-state alcohol retailers can be deemed constitutional under the … |
| 25A593 |
Chicago Wine Company, et al. v. Mike Braun, Governor of Indiana, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2025-11-19 |
Application |
|
alcohol-regulation dormant-commerce-clause interstate-commerce physical-presence three-tier-system twenty-first-amendment |
Whether a state's requirement that wine retailers establish an in-state physical presence before shipping alcoholic beverages to consumers discriminat… |
| 22-285 |
B-21 Wines, Inc., et al. v. Hank Bauer, Chair, North Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-09-27 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split commerce-clause interstate-commerce nondiscrimination-principle public-health-and-safety retail-distribution retail-wine-distribution twenty-first-amendment wine-shipping |
Does the nondiscrimination principle of the Commerce Clause apply to and invalidate North Carolina's law allowing only in-state retailers to ship wine… |
| 20-1767 |
Sarasota Wine Market, LLC, et al. v. Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-06-21 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
commerce-clause nondiscrimination nondiscrimination-principle online-market physical-presence regulatory-interests state-regulation twenty-first-amendment wine-retailers |
Whether Missouri's law prohibiting out-of-state wine retailers from participating in its online market violates the Commerce Clause despite the Twenty… |
| 20-47 |
Lebamoff Enterprises, Inc., et al. v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-07-20 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
commerce-clause direct-to-consumer-shipping interstate-commerce liquor-regulation nondiscrimination-principle state-authority state-liquor-law twenty-first-amendment |
Whether a state liquor law that allows in-state retailers to ship wine directly to consumers but prohibits out-of-state retailers from doing so, is in… |
| 18-96 |
Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Russell F. Thomas, Executive Director of the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-07-20 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (23)Response Waived |
dormant-commerce-clause interstate-commerce liquor-regulation liquor-sales residency-requirement residency-requirements retail-licenses retail-licensing state-licensing twenty-first-amendment wholesale-licenses wholesale-licensing |
Whether the Twenty-first Amendment empowers States, consistent with the dormant Commerce Clause, to regulate liquor sales by granting retail or wholes… |