nondiscrimination-principle
3 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22-285 | B-21 Wines, Inc., et al. v. Hank Bauer, Chair, North Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission | Fourth Circuit | 2022-09-27 | Denied | Amici (3)Response RequestedRelisted (2) | circuit-split commerce-clause interstate-commerce nondiscrimination-principle public-health-and-safety retail-distribution retail-wine-distribution twenty-first-amendment wine-shipping | Does the nondiscrimination principle of the Commerce Clause apply to and invalidate North Carolina's law allowing only in-state retailers to ship wine… |
| 20-1767 | Sarasota Wine Market, LLC, et al. v. Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. | Eighth Circuit | 2021-06-21 | Denied | Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | commerce-clause nondiscrimination nondiscrimination-principle online-market physical-presence regulatory-interests state-regulation twenty-first-amendment wine-retailers | Whether Missouri's law prohibiting out-of-state wine retailers from participating in its online market violates the Commerce Clause despite the Twenty… |
| 20-47 | Lebamoff Enterprises, Inc., et al. v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2020-07-20 | Denied | Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) | commerce-clause direct-to-consumer-shipping interstate-commerce liquor-regulation nondiscrimination-principle state-authority state-liquor-law twenty-first-amendment | Whether a state liquor law that allows in-state retailers to ship wine directly to consumers but prohibits out-of-state retailers from doing so, is in… |