No. 25-857

Joshua Yarbrough, et al. v. SlashSupport, Incorporated, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2026-01-20
Status: Pending
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: circumstantial-evidence civil-rights employment-discrimination judicial-doctrine stray-remarks summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina Privacy
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether discriminatory remarks categorized as stray under a judicial doctrine may be excluded from the mix of circumstantial evidence of discrimination

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether discriminatory remarks categorized as stray under a judicial doctrine may be excluded from the mix of circumstantial evidence of discrimination. ii PARTIES The parties to this proceeding are set out in the caption. iii RELATED CASES Yarbrough, et al. v. Glow Networks, et al . in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, Case No. 4:19-CV-905-SDJ. Judgment entered on May 15, 2024. Yarbrough, et al. v. Glow Networks, et al . in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Case No. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, Case No. 24-40421. Judgment entered on October 22, 2025.

Docket Entries

2026-01-23
Waiver of Glow Networks, Inc. of right to respond submitted.
2026-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Glow Networks, Inc. to respond filed.
2026-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2026)

Attorneys

Glow Networks, Inc.
Charles Thomas Frazier Jr.Alexander Dubose & Jefferson LLP, Respondent
Charles Thomas Frazier Jr.Alexander Dubose & Jefferson LLP, Respondent
Joshua Yarbrough; Matt Lofland; Lee Green; Sterling Vicks; Joshua Walker; Michael Brown; Adawale Ashiru; Paul Tijani; Peter Tijani; Brandon Price; Harom Pringle; Osasu William Aigheyisi; Brett Samuels; and Rukevwe Ologban
Brian P. SanfordThe Sanford Firm, Petitioner
Brian P. SanfordThe Sanford Firm, Petitioner