No. 25-921
Malcolm Wilson v. Angelita Castaneda
Tags: due-process inmate-rights prison-disciplinary-board procedural-fairness restitution-sanction trust-account
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process requires a prison disciplinary board to provide 'some evidence' of the amount of actual or estimated loss caused by an inmate's actions before depriving the inmate of his trust-account funds by imposing a restitution sanction
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether due process requires a prison disciplinary board to provide “some evidence” of the amount of actual or estimated loss caused by an inmate’s actions before depriving the inmate of his trust -account funds by imposing a restitution sanction.
Docket Entries
2026-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2026)
2025-12-01
Application (25A620) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until February 2, 2026.
2025-11-21
Application (25A620) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 4, 2025 to February 2, 2026, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Malcolm Wilson
Michael Louis Lindinger — Mayer Brown, Petitioner
Michael Louis Lindinger — Mayer Brown, Petitioner