No. 25-942

In Re Ronny Jackson, Individually and as U.S. Representative for Texas's 13th Congressional District, et al.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2026-02-09
Status: Pending
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: congressional-districts district-court jurisdictional-requirements mandamus statutory-interpretation three-judge-court
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Immigration Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2284(a) requires a district judge to request the convening of a three-judge district court whenever an action is filed challenging the constitutionality of congressional district apportionment

Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2284(a) requires a district judge to request the convening of a three-judge district court whenever an action is filed “challenging the constitutionality of the apportionment of congressional districts,” unless the claim is “wholly insubstantial” as recognized by this Court in Shapiro v. McManus , 577 U.S. 39 (2015).

Docket Entries

2026-01-20
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due March 11, 2026)

Attorneys

Ronny Jackson, et al.
Edward Andrew PaltzikTaylor Dykema PLLC, Petitioner
Edward Andrew PaltzikTaylor Dykema PLLC, Petitioner