No. 25-959
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: advertising-campaign circuit-split consumer-deception false-advertising jury-inference lanham-act
Key Terms:
Trademark
Trademark
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a jury hearing a false advertising case under the Lanham Act should be barred from inferring consumer deception and reliance upon finding that a defendant conducted a deliberately false advertising campaign.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a jury hearing a false advertising case under the Lanham Act should be barred from inferring consumer deception and reliance upon finding that a defendant conducted a deliberately false advertising campaign
Docket Entries
2026-02-12
Waiver of Natera, Inc. of right to respond submitted.
2026-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent Natera, Inc. to respond filed.
2026-02-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 13, 2026)
2025-12-19
Application (25A708) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 7, 2026.
2025-12-15
Application (25A708) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 8, 2026 to February 9, 2026, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
CareDx, Inc.
Noel John Francisco — Jones Day, Petitioner
Natera, Inc.
Robert Thomas Smith — Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Respondent