| 25-959 |
CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc. |
Third Circuit |
2026-02-11 |
Pending |
Response Waived |
advertising-campaign circuit-split consumer-deception false-advertising jury-inference lanham-act |
Whether a jury hearing a false advertising case under the Lanham Act should be barred from inferring consumer deception and reliance upon finding that… |
| 25A708 |
CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc. |
Third Circuit |
2025-12-17 |
Application |
|
circuit-split consumer-deception false-advertising lanham-act trademark-law willful-misrepresentation |
Whether a federal appellate court can reject a presumption of consumer deception in a Lanham Act false advertising case when a campaign is demonstrabl… |
| 22-7060 |
Zachary James McAlexander v. D.G. Yuengling & Son, Inc., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-03-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights consumer-protection corporate-liability due-process false-advertising first-amendment seventh-amendment standing |
Why is the right to petition the government for grievances not being honored in this case, along with others, in accordance with the First Amendment a… |
| 22-447 |
Johnson & Johnson, et al. v. California |
California |
2022-11-15 |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
civil-penalties civil-procedure civil-rights consumer-protection due-process fair-notice false-advertising free-speech speech-chilling statutory-interpretation unfair-competition-law |
Whether a robust fair notice standard applies to California's Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law |
| 21-415 |
Carmen Electra, et al. v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc., dba New York Dolls Gentlemen's Club, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2021-09-15 |
Denied |
|
celebrity commercial-identity commercial-interest false-advertising identity-misuse image-rights lanham-act legal-standing public-prominence trademark-misuse |
Must an individual prove they have a commercial interest in their identity, or must a person prove they are recognizable, publicly prominent, or a cel… |
| 21-195 |
Belmora LLC, et al. v. Bayer Consumer Care AG, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-08-11 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
false-advertising false-association lanham-act statute-of-limitations trademark-registration trademark-territoriality |
Whether the Lanham Act's zone of interests extends to the foreign owner of a foreign trademark that has not registered or used the mark in the United … |
| 20-220 |
VBS Distribution, Inc., et al. v. Nutrivita Laboratories, Inc., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-08-25 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response Waived |
actual-injury article-three circuit-split civil-rights due-process false-advertising lanham-act standing uniform-application |
Whether a plaintiff in a false-advertising case must demonstrate 'actual injury' to state a claim under the Lanham Act |
| 19-988 |
Living Essentials, LLC, et al. v. Washington |
Washington |
2020-02-06 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
central-hudson commercial-speech consumer-protection false-advertising federal-trade-commission first-amendment free-speech prior-substantiation substantiation-doctrine washington-state-law |
Whether the prior substantiation doctrine violates the First Amendment |
| 19-152 |
Amarin Pharma, Inc., et al. v. International Trade Commission, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-08-01 |
Denied |
|
false-advertising federal-circuit food-drug-cosmetic-act international-trade-commission lanham-act pom-wonderful-v-coca-cola tariff-act tariff-act-1930 trade-practices unfair-competition unfair-trade-practices |
When a manufacturer files a Lanham Act claim under the Tariff Act for competitive injuries caused by unfair trade practices, is the claim barred as a … |
| 18-8517 |
Roderick Jermaine Hall v. Sprint Corporation |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-03-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
antitrust civil-rights consumer-protection contract-disclosure contract-law disability-rights disclosure-requirements due-process false-advertising federal-regulations network-management service-limitations telecommunications telecommunications-law |
Whether Sprint failed to disclose information about network management practices for its Unlimited Freedom Plan and Apple iPhone 7 Plus |
| 18-6660 |
Mustafa Hasan Arif v. United States |
First Circuit |
2018-11-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
15-usc-52-57 advertising-law civil-procedure criminal-intent false-advertising first-circuit intent-to-defraud intent-to-harm non-prescription-drugs statutory-interpretation wire-fraud |
Whether petitioner was wrongly prosecuted under the Wire Fraud statute |
| 18-304 |
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, et al. v. Jennifer Davidson |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-09-11 |
Denied |
|
article-iii-standing consumer-protection consumer-standing deception declaratory-judgment false-advertising future-harm injunctive-relief product-misrepresentation standing |
Whether a consumer who has used a product and determined that a representation concerning that product is allegedly misleading can plausibly allege a … |