Whether a federal agency's adverse employment action constitutes unlawful retaliation under Title VII when an employee has engaged in protected EEO activity

No question identified. : agency EEO activity records. This case involves significant Title VII issues, including potential circuit splits on pretext and protected activity, and the lower court’s misapplication of the “terms and conditions” prong in evaluating the claim. This application is filed more than 10 days before the due date and has been served on all parties, Respectfully submitted, Haren gun” Hien Thi Nguyen Pro Se Petitioner 17763 Lull St, Reseda, CA 91335 (818) 926-7885 Dated: November 7, 2025 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on November 7, 2025, I served copies of this Motion to Extend Time on counsels for respondent: Joseph W. Tursi | Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office | Central District of California 300 N. Los Angeles Street, Suite 7516 | Los Angeles, CA 90012 and Daniel A. Beck | Assistant United States Attorney Deputy Chief, Complex and Defensive Litigation Section United States Attorney’s Office | Central District of California 300 N. Los Angeles Street, Suite 7516 | Los Angeles, CA 90012 by first-class mail. Hien Thi Nguyen