| 23-6593 |
Larry Rush, aka Leroy Thomas v. Michael Zaken, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2024-01-26 |
Denied |
appeals appellate-procedure constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-review jurisdiction petition-denial third-circuit |
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit err in affirming Mr. Rush's Denial of Habeas Corpus? |
| 22-7174 |
James R. Householder, Jr. v. Michael Zaken, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-04-03 |
Denied |
cross-examination due-process Fair-trial Fourteenth-Amendment Impeachment Inconsistent-testimony ineffective-assistance Ineffective-counsel Sixth-Amendment witness-testimony |
Due-process |
| 22-5323 |
Douglas Stephenson v. Michael Zaken, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2022-08-09 |
Denied |
administrative-law civil-rights patent procedural-due-process standing takings |
Whether the lower court erred in its procedural-due-process, civil-rights, standing, takings, patent, administrative-law analysis |
| 21-7437 |
Steven Hutchinson v. Michael Zaken, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2022-03-22 |
Denied |
batson-challenge Batson-v-Kentucky constitutional-violation ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-selection presumption-of-prejudice racial-discrimination strickland-standard Strickland-v-Washington |
Should prejudice under Strickland v. Washington be presumed for an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim based on counsel's failure to object to unc… |
| 21A366 |
Steven Hutchinson v. Michael Zaken, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2022-01-26 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 20-5965 |
Vito A. Pelino v. Michael Zaken, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2020-10-08 |
Denied |
case-reopening civil-procedure due-process extraordinary-circumstances federal-courts judicial-discretion rule-60(b) rule-60b state-courts substantive-claim |
Whether jurists of reason can debate that repeated decisions to ignore (not dismiss or deny) a substantive claim constitutes sufficiently 'extraordina… |