Search
6 results for “Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC”
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-6113 | Laura Hammett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, et al. | Eighth Circuit | 2024-12-10 | Denied | appellate-review civil-procedure clearly-erroneous due-process judicial-discretion summary-affirmance | Whether the Eighth Circuit violated due process by affirming district court orders without addressing clearly erroneous findings and apparent legal er… |
| 24M44 | Laura Lynn Hammett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, et al. | Eighth Circuit | 2024-11-08 | Presumed Complete | None | |
| 23A779 | Logic Technology Development LLC v. Food and Drug Administration | Third Circuit | 2024-02-26 | Presumed Complete | administrative-law agency-rulemaking arbitrary-capricious electronic-nicotine fda-regulation marketing-application | Whether the FDA improperly adopted a new and heightened evidentiary burden for marketing applications for electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) … |
| 21-1188 | Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Iris Pounds, et al. | North Carolina | 2022-02-28 | Denied | arbitration-rights assignee-rights assignees contract-law discrimination-against-arbitration evidentiary-burden federal-arbitration-act preemption third-party-beneficiary | Whether the FAA preempts a state rule of contract law that requires assignees seeking to enforce arbitration rights to meet a higher evidentiary burde… |
| 21A344 | Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Iris Pounds, et al. | North Carolina | 2022-01-19 | Presumed Complete | None | |
| 18-204 | Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Iris Pounds, et al. | Fourth Circuit | 2018-08-16 | Denied | appellate-review civil-procedure federal-jurisdiction fraud independent-action independent-actions lack-of-jurisdiction rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-judgment state-court-judgments subject-matter-jurisdiction | Does the Rooker-Feldman doctrine prohibit a federal district court from exercising jurisdiction over an independent action challenging the validity of… |