| 24-189 |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. Food and Drug Administration, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-08-21 |
Denied |
commercial-speech first-amendment government-mandated-warnings graphic-warnings tobacco-regulation zauderer-standard |
Whether provocative and misleading government-mandated graphic warnings on cigarette packaging are 'purely factual and uncontroversial' under Zauderer… |
| 23-207 |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-09-06 |
Denied |
engine-manufacturers federal-law federal-preemption national-meat ninth-circuit preemption product-standards sales-ban sales-bans state-standards tobacco-control-act |
Whether the Tobacco Control Act expressly preempts state and local laws that prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco products |
| 22A910 |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. Robert Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-04-18 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 22A474 |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. Robert Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-11-29 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 22-338 |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-10-12 |
Denied |
civil-rights express-preemption federal-regulation flavored-tobacco ninth-circuit preemption sales-ban state-and-local-laws tobacco-control-act |
Whether the Tobacco Control Act expressly preempts state and local laws that prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco products |
| 22A33 |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-07-14 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 18-649 |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. Cheryl Searcy, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Carol LaSard |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-11-20 |
Denied |
actually-decided civil-procedure claim-preclusion class-action constitutional-law due-process eleventh-circuit issue-preclusion jury-findings opportunity-to-be-heard preclusion |
Whether the Due Process Clause is violated by a rule that permits plaintiffs to invoke a prior jury's findings to establish elements of their claims w… |
| 18-621 |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. Mary Faricy Pardue, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John N. Faricy |
Florida |
2018-11-14 |
Denied |
appellate-review civil-procedure collateral-estoppel constitutional-law due-process engle issue-preclusion jury-findings preclusion preclusion-doctrine prior-jury-findings res-judicata tobacco |
Is the Due Process Clause violated by a rule that permits a plaintiff to invoke a prior jury's findings to establish elements of her claims without sh… |
| 18A234 |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. Mary Faricy Pardue, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John N. Faricy |
Florida |
2018-09-04 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|