| 23-5255 |
Robert L. Swinton, Jr. v. Livingston County, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-08-01 |
Denied |
8th-amendment access-to-courts actual-injury civil-rights deliberate-indifference due-process medical-neglect monell-claim monell-policy prisoner-rights |
Is this the correct evaluation of the evidence for deliberate indifference and would the Monell policy standard be eroded by the evaluation of this ca… |
| 22-7739 |
Robert L. Swinton, Jr. v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2023-06-09 |
Denied |
2nd-amendment brady-v-maryland brady-violation due-process firearms-statute jurisdiction speedy-trial standing tenth-amendment witness-impeachment |
Is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) constitutional and was Tenth Amendment jurisdiction maintained for firearms alleged in this case? |
| 19-8275 |
Robert L. Swinton v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2020-04-16 |
Denied |
automatic-exclusion complex-motion due-process pretrial-detention prior-conviction selective-prosecution sixth-amendment speedy-trial structural-error |
Was there error in the U.S. Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial and Speedy Trial Act assessment of this case? |
| 19-7625 |
Robert L. Swinton, Jr. v. Florida |
Florida |
2020-02-12 |
Rehearing |
appeal constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-appeal due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel sentencing sentencing-errors sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment structural-error |
Whether sentencing errors were corrected by appeals court on direct appeal without defense counsel, and whether there was a constitutional denial of c… |
| 18-6837 |
Robert L. Swinton, Jr. v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-11-27 |
Denied |
anders-brief appellate-review collateral-attack due-process extraordinary-writ federal-habeas-corpus habeas-corpus in-forma-pauperis ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se-defendant sixth-amendment state-court-review |
If the merits of an appeal exist and are not evaluated by a State or Federal Court of review, should a Federal court address Ineffective Assistance of… |