Santosky-v-Kramer

4 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
23-7314 S. C. v. Vermont Vermont 2024-04-26 Denied Response WaivedIFP child-welfare clear-and-convincing due-process fourteenth-amendment hearsay hearsay-evidence parental-rights parental-unfitness santosky-standard santosky-v-kramer Whether Vermont's law allowing courts to terminate parental rights based on hearsay violates the Fourteenth Amendment
22-5595 L. B. v. Washington State Department of Children, Youth & Families Washington 2022-09-16 Denied Relisted (2)IFP 14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process parental-rights preponderance-of-evidence preponderance-of-the-evidence santosky-precedent Santosky-v-Kramer Did the state of Washington violate Mr. Baker's 14th-amendment-rights by terminating his parental-rights under a preponderance-of-the-evidence-standar…
21-32 Elizabeth C. v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services California 2021-07-09 Denied child-custody clear-and-convincing-evidence due-process fourteenth-amendment parental-rights santosky-v-kramer state-intervention termination-of-parental-rights Whether the Fourteenth Amendment due process requirement articulated in Santosky v Kramer requires a finding of parental unfitness by clear and convin…
19-6175 K. S. v. Contra Costa County Children & Family Services Bureau California 2019-10-07 Denied Relisted (2)IFP california-welfare-and-institution-code civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection federalism fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment santosky-v-kramer sixth-amendment standing supreme-court-precedent welfare-code Whether the application of California Welfare and Institution Code violated petitioner's constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth A…