| 25-7067 |
Davonte J. Coe v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2026-03-18 |
Pending |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review clearly-erroneous-standard excessive-force factual-findings party-presentation-principle remand |
When a district court declines to make factual findings because an antecedent legal ruling makes those findings unnecessary, and an appellant challeng… |
| 25-5973 |
Eric Michael Schuster v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-10-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review clearly-erroneous-standard due-process fourteenth-amendment mixed-questions-of-law standard-of-review |
Whether a reviewing court must strictly adhere to the Supreme Court requirement that a district court's fact-findings "must not be set aside unless cl… |
| 24-5866 |
Edward Moses v. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-10-31 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
attorney-sanctions clearly-erroneous-standard constitutional-challenge federal-jurisdiction sovereign-immunity tribal-recognition |
On March 15, 2024, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal held that, Edward Moses, Jr., a lawyer who has proclaimed himself "Emperor of the A… |
| 22-6223 |
Byron O. Woods Sr. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2022-12-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure clearly-erroneous-standard conclusions-of-law court-of-appeals fact-finding federal-circuit judicial-conflict legal-findings pullman-standard rule-52(a) standard-of-review |
(1) The Pullman-Standard , 456 U.S. 273 (1982), this Court developed which is the
standard for reviewing jurisprudence for issues of fact and issues … |
| 19-8372 |
Abdul Hakiym Ismaiyl v. Donald C. Nugent |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-04-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-discretion appellate-review circuit-court-review clearly-erroneous clearly-erroneous-standard factual-findings frivolous-claims in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion record-review standard-of-review |
Whether a Circuit court, once the veracity of the factual findings of a Dist. Court has been contended not to exist, and not supported by the record, … |
| 19-7061 |
Charles Edward Smith v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-12-27 |
Granted |
IFP |
appellate-review batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky burden-shifting clearly-erroneous-standard jury-selection peremptory-challenge prima-facie-case racial-discrimination standard-of-review |
In Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 97 (1986), the Court set forth a three-step protocol to prevent racial discrimination in jury selection. It applie… |
| 19-6483 |
Carl Robinson v. Bernadette Mason, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Retreat |
Third Circuit |
2019-11-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment civil-procedure clearly-erroneous-standard clearly-erroneous'-rule-52(a),exhaustion-of-remedi conviction court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process exhaustion-of-remedies judicial-independence judicial-procedure legal-remedy procedural-due-process standard-of-review statute supplemental-response timeliness unfairness Was the Petitioner denied due process of law,in vi |
1 This case presents the question when there's no authority in the Federal Court's that countenances the preparation of the opinion by the attorney fo… |
| 18-8216 |
Zavia L. Johnson v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2019-03-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review clearly-erroneous clearly-erroneous-standard law-enforcement-officer law-enforcement-testimony scott-v-harris standard-of-review testimony video-evidence videotape videotape-evidence |
Does a federal courts of appeals misapply the clearly erroneous standard of review when it upholds a district court's crediting of a law enforcement o… |