cost-recovery
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-758 | Moreland Properties LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2025-12-29 | Pending | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse Waived | cercla cost-recovery environmental-law national-contingency-plan private-party-cleanup substantial-compliance | Under CERCLA, private parties who clean up contaminated land may recover their costs from polluters only if their cleanup substantially complies with … |
| 25A505 | Moreland Properties LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2025-11-04 | Application | cercla cost-recovery environmental-cleanup national-contingency-plan state-regulators substantial-compliance | Whether a state's approval of a private environmental cleanup action is sufficient to establish substantial compliance with the National Contingency P… | |
| 23A286 | MRP Properties Company, LLC, et al. v. United States | Sixth Circuit | 2023-10-02 | Presumed Complete | CERCLA cost-recovery environmental-cleanup government-control hazardous-waste operator-liability | Whether the United States qualifies as an 'operator' under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act when it exercises… | |
| 22-126 | Gould Electronics, Inc. v. Livingston County Road Commission | Sixth Circuit | 2022-08-09 | Denied | Relisted (2) | cercla cost-recovery environmental-liability expert-witness expert-witness-fees lobbying necessary-costs-of-response recovery regulatory-determination remedial-action tce-contamination | Are fees paid to an expert witness and consultant for lobbying and testimony 'necessary costs of response' under CERCLA? |