| 23-585 |
John Duncan Fordham v. Georgia Department of Administrative Services, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-12-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure equity equity-doctrine jurisdictional-challenge mandatory-victims-restitution-act money-had-and-received presidential-pardon restitution restitution-funds |
Do funds collected under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act vest in a claimant or are they subject to recoupment after a Presidential Pardon? |
| 23-269 |
Charles Juntikka v. Cadell & Chapman, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-09-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
arbitration-agreement arbitrator-decision civil-procedure contract-interpretation due-process equity-doctrine federal-arbitration-act serious-error stolt-nielsen-v-animal-feeds supreme-court-precedent |
Does the Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers holding that an arbitrator's 'serious error' does not suffice to overturn an arbitrator'… |
| 22-659 |
Padma Rao v. Anita Rao, et al. |
Illinois |
2023-01-18 |
Denied |
|
american-rule due-process equity equity-doctrine fee-shifting litigation-penalty pleading-requirements retroactive retroactive-application |
Whether it was a violation of due process to retroactively impose a new fee-shifting penalty in contravention of the established American Rule |
| 22-5607 |
Steven Justin Villalona v. Mr. Hansen, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-09-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure equity equity-doctrine federal-rules-civil-procedure filing houston-v-lack notice notice-of-judgment pro-se pro-se-prisoner statutory-interpretation |
Whether this Court's holding in Houston v. Lack was based on equity or the interpretation of the word filed? |
| 21-1250 |
Jamal Darius Parker v. Antony Blinken, Secretary of State, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-03-15 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-provisions equitable-remedy equity equity-doctrine fiduciary-duty judicial-discretion procedural-rights treaties treaty-law |
Whether the lower court's and agent's who are people bound by oath to be Persons worthy of trust, decision to dismiss petitioner claim is not contrary… |