| 25A419 |
Banc of America Securities LLC, et al. v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-10-14 |
Presumed Complete |
|
antitrust class-certification damages-class-action expert-evidence federal-rule-civil-procedure predominance |
Whether a district court must resolve disputes about expert evidence when determining class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(… |
| 24-1218 |
Phillip Alig, et al. v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-05-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii certification class-action federal-rule-civil-procedure injury-in-fact standing |
Whether a federal court may certify a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) when some members of the proposed class lack a… |
| 23-814 |
Visa Inc., et al. v. National ATM Council, Inc., et al. |
District of Columbia |
2024-01-29 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
antitrust antitrust-impact civil-procedure class-action class-certification classwide-impact federal-rule-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure material-dispute merits merits-determination |
Whether a district court validly certifies a class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) |
| 23-103 |
Bruce Ellis, et al. v. City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-08-02 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
attorney-general-certification civil-procedure constitutional-amendment court-jurisdiction due-process federal-question federal-rule-civil-procedure solicitor-general takings vagueness-doctrine |
whether-federal-rule-civil-procedure-5.1(b)-requires-court-certification-of-unconstitutional-act |
| 22-562 |
Stephen Douglass, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Shingo Alexander Douglass, et al. v. Nippon Yusen Kabushki Kaisha |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-12-19 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
admiralty-jurisdiction admiralty-law due-process federal-courts federal-rule-civil-procedure fifth-amendment high-seas law-of-nations personal-jurisdiction state-courts |
Whether the Fifth Amendment imposes the same restrictions on personal jurisdiction by federal courts as the Fourteenth Amendment imposes on state cour… |
| 19-380 |
Alfred Lam, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-09-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure-60b civil-rights discrimination disparate-treatment federal-court federal-rule-civil-procedure harassment hostile-work-environment judgment legal-error motion-for-relief ongoing-discrimination pro-se-plaintiffs retaliation |
Whether a federal court may grant relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) for legal error |
| 19-5353 |
Frank Elroy Vennes, Jr. v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-07-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 28-usc-section-2255 civil-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-habeas federal-rule-civil-procedure gonzalez-v-crosby habeas-corpus integrity-of-proceedings judicial-integrity motion-to-reconsider rule-60(d)(3) |
Does a motion filed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3) that does not attack the merits of a prior habeas decision, but alleges 'some defec… |
| 18-1129 |
Cadian Capital Management, LP, et al. v. Terry Klein, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-02-28 |
Dismissed |
|
article-iii-jurisdiction circuit-split civil-procedure federal-rule-civil-procedure jurisdiction jurisdictional-standing mootness plaintiff-substitution rule-17-substitution rule-17(a)(3) rule-17a3 securities-exchange-act securities-exchange-act-1934 securities-exchange-act-of-1934 shareholder-action shareholder-derivative-action standing substitution |
Whether a shareholder action under § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction once the sole plaintiff h… |
| 18-5758 |
Annamalai Annamalai v. Parvathi Sivanadiyan |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-08-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-procedure-68 dismissal dismissal-with-prejudice federal-rule-68 federal-rule-civil-procedure federal-rules frivolous frivolous-complaint judgment-offer mailbox-rule offer-and-acceptance offer-of-judgment prejudice prison-mailbox-rule prisoner-filing |
Whether a district court can dismiss a complaint filed under 9 U.S.C.4 as frivolous and can dismiss with prejudice, after the mailing of an unconditio… |