illinois-brick
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25A1084 | United Biologics, LLC v. Amerigroup Tennessee, Inc., et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2026-04-03 | Application | antitrust-standing group-boycott illinois-brick market-exclusion proximate-cause sherman-act | Question not identified. | |
| 25-1070 | AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al. v. Mosaic Health, Inc., et al. | Second Circuit | 2026-03-11 | Pending | Amici (1) | antitrust-law conspiracy Illinois-Brick indirect-purchaser lost-profits trade-association | Whether Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), which bars antitrust claims by indirect purchasers and sellers, applies to a claim of "lo… |
| 22-289 | The National Association of Realtors, et al. v. The PLS.com, LLC | Ninth Circuit | 2022-09-27 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | antitrust antitrust-market illinois-brick indirect-network-effects indirect-purchaser-rule multiple-listing-services ohio-v-american-express relevant-market standing-to-sue two-sided-platform | First, in defining the relevant antitrust market for a two-sided platform with indirect network effects, can courts simply elect not to analyze both s… |
| 21-722 | Melvin Salveson, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al. | Second Circuit | 2021-11-16 | Denied | Response Waived | american-express antitrust antitrust-law consumer-rights direct-purchaser illinois-brick price-fixing transaction-fee transaction-fees two-sided-platform two-sided-platforms | Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois , 431 U.S. 720 (1977) holds that plaintiffs who directly purchase products from an antitrust violator may sue to recove… |
| 19-1098 | National Football League, et al. v. Ninth Inning, Inc., et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2020-03-09 | Denied | Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (6) | antitrust-market competition-harm damages-claim illinois-brick indirect-purchaser joint-venture rule-of-reason sherman-act | 1. Whether an agreement among the members of a joint venture on how best to distribute the venture's jointly created core product may be condemned und… |