| 21-1307 |
Santa Ana Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP, et al. v. Rubyann Mondragon |
California |
2022-03-30 |
GVR |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
arbitration-agreement california-private-attorneys-general-act class-action employee-rights federal-arbitration-act iskanian-rule iskanian-v-cls-transport lamps-plus-v-varela representative-claims supreme-court-precedent |
Does the Federal Arbitration Act require enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that an employee cannot raise representative claim… |
| 21-13 |
KinderCare Education, LLC v. Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, et al. |
California |
2021-07-07 |
Denied |
|
arbitration-agreement contra-proferentem federal-arbitration-act lamps-plus-v-varela preemption state-common-law state-law supreme-court-precedent |
Whether California courts can avoid consideration of Lamps Plus v. Varela and instead adhere to a contrary state appellate precedent |
| 19-1382 |
Sterling Jewelers, Inc. v. Laryssa Jock, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2020-06-16 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
absent-class-members arbitration arbitration-agreement arbitrator-authority class-arbitration consent consent-requirement contract-interpretation due-process lamps-plus lamps-plus-v-varela stolt-nielsen stolt-nielsen-v-animalfeeds |
Whether an arbitrator may compel class arbitration without finding actual consent, and instead based only on a finding that the agreement does not una… |