patent-challenge
9 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-149 | United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A. | Federal Circuit | 2025-08-07 | Denied | administrative-law administrative-procedure-act agency-decision arbitrary-capricious patent-challenge patent-trial-appeal-board | "It is a fundamental principle of administrative law that agencies must treat like cases alike." Grayscale Invs., LLC v. SEC, 82 F.4th 1239, 1242 (D.C… | |
| 25A14 | Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2025-07-03 | Presumed Complete | america-invents-act critical-date inter-partes-review patent-challenge printed-publication prior-art | Question not identified. | |
| 21-1327 | Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated | Federal Circuit | 2022-04-05 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | article-iii article-three-standing inter-partes-review license-agreement medimmune patent-challenge patent-validity qualcomm-dispute standing | This case presents the same question as Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc., No. 21-746 (U.S.) ("Apple I"), in which the Court recently called for the views o… |
| 21-819 | Baxter Corporation Englewood v. Becton, Dickinson and Company | Federal Circuit | 2021-12-02 | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act expert-testimony inter-partes-review ordinary-remand-rule patent patent-challenge prior-art remand-rule statutory-interpretation | A petitioner may challenge an issued patent in an inter partes review (IPR) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, an agency tribunal, but "only on… |
| 21-746 | Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated | Federal Circuit | 2021-11-19 | Denied | CVSGAmici (5)Relisted (2) | article-iii civil-procedure civil-rights due-process inter-partes-review license-agreement patent patent-challenge patent-validity standing takings | Whether a licensee has Article III standing to challenge the validity of a patent covered by a license agreement that covers multiple patents. |
| 20-779 | Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation | Federal Circuit | 2020-12-08 | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | administrative-proceeding article-iii-standing article-three-standing fda-approval inter-partes-review joint-venture leahy-smith-america-invents-act patent-challenge patent-validity pharmaceutical-industry pharmaceutical-patent | Did the Federal Circuit categorically and erroneously preclude redress for injured members of joint ventures in the pharmaceutical industry by only re… |
| 20-737 | B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. C&D Zodiac, Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2020-11-27 | Denied | Response Waived | administrative-procedure america-invents-act inter-partes-review obviousness patent-challenge patent-validity printed-publications prior-art statutory-interpretation | In an inter partes review proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), does the Board have authority to consider unpatentability on a ground of obviousness th… |
| 19-829 | Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2019-12-31 | Denied | Response Waived | administrative-procedure burden-of-proof due-process evidence inter-partes-review patent patent-challenge patent-law reply reply-evidence | When a party files a petition for Inter Partes Review, the petition "must identify 'each claim challenged,' the grounds for the challenge, and the evi… |
| 18-899 | Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2019-01-11 | Denied | administrative-law administrative-proceeding federal-circuit indian-tribe inter-partes-review patent-challenge patent-law patent-office patent-trial-and-appeal-board sovereign-immunity tribal-sovereign-immunity | Whether inter partes review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is the type of proceeding in which tribal sovereign immunity may be asserted |