pro-per
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-5366 | Jane Doe v. Jack Dwosh | California | 2025-08-14 | Denied | IFP | due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines fourteenth-amendment indigent-party pro-per | Does the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause protect a pro per indigent party in State courts, whether or not she uses the term 'Eighth Amendmen… |
| 23A940 | Norma Ortiz Fernandez v. La Clinica | California | 2024-04-19 | Presumed Complete | appellate-review due-process legal-extension miscarriage-of-justice petition-for-review pro-per | Whether the lower appellate court misapplied facts and denied due process in a manner that constitutes a miscarriage of justice | |
| 21-7631 | Johnell Lee Carter v. Hunter Anglea, Warden | Ninth Circuit | 2022-04-15 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process pro-per pro-per-status right-to-counsel self-representation sixth-amendment trial-court-discretion | Whether the trial court denied Petitioner's right to self-representation |
| 19-6458 | Torrence E. Davis v. Arizona | Arizona | 2019-10-31 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | conditional-demand constitutional-rights criminal-procedure equivocal-invocation equivocal-request faretta-right faretta-v-california judicial-discretion new-counsel pro-per right-to-counsel self-representation self-representation-right trial-court-advisement waiver-of-counsel | Whether a conditional request to proceed pro per is automatically equivocal |