rule-26
2 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19-1010 | Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc., et al. v. Connecticut, et al. | Third Circuit | 2020-02-13 | Denied | Amici (6) | civil-procedure civil-procedure-discovery claw-back discovery discovery-scope document-production federal-rules-of-civil-procedure mandamus mandamus-review proportionality relevance relevance-standard rule-26 scope-of-discovery | Whether a district court may compel a party that has not engaged in discovery-related misconduct to produce documents that are neither relevant nor re… |
| 19-6944 | Bahman Khodayari v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2019-12-16 | Denied | IFP | 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights damages discovery due-process nominal-damages rule-26 rule-26(a)(1)(A)(ii) rule-37 rule-37(c)(1) rule-41 rule-41(b) sanctions section-1983 | Does the Ninth Circuit's affirmance of the District Court's dismissal of a Petitioner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(b) due to Ru… |