two-step-framework
3 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21-1281 | Interactive Wearables, LLC v. Polar Electro Oy, et al. | Federal Circuit | 2022-03-22 | Denied | CVSGAmici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) | 35-usc-101 abstract-idea claim-construction enablement judicial-exceptions legal-standard patent-eligibility patent-subject-matter section-101 two-step-framework | What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is 'directed to' a patent-ineligible concept under step one of the Court's two… |
| 21-1106 | Thaddeus Gabara v. Facebook, Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2022-02-10 | Denied | Response Waived | 35-usc-101 abstract-idea data-structure patent-claims patent-eligibility preemption prior-art section-101 two-step-framework | What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is 'directed to' a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the Court's two-s… |
| 20-891 | American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC, et al. | Federal Circuit | 2021-01-05 | Denied | CVSGAmici (11)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) | 35-usc-101 alice-v-cls claim-construction judicial-exception judicial-exceptions patent-eligibility patent-ineligibility patent-law standard-of-review two-step-framework | What is the appropriate standard for determining patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101? |