No. 18-1108

Stephanie C. Stucky v. Dwight Takeno, et al.

Lower Court: Hawaii
Docketed: 2019-02-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure civil-procedure collective-bargaining due-process labor-relations mootness prohibited-practice prohibited-practices voluntary-cessation
Key Terms:
Arbitration LaborRelations JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Petitioner did not receive due process when the Prohibited Practice Complaint was dismissed as moot, despite the respondents voluntarily ceasing violations after the complaint was filed

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Petitioner in this case receive due process of law when the Hawai‘i Labor Relations Board dismissed Petitioner’s Prohibited Practice Complaint on alleged grounds of being “moot” because Respondents voluntarily ceased continued violations of the subject Collective Bargaining Agreement only subsequent to Petitioner filing her Prohibited Practices Complaint before the Hawai‘i Labor Relations Board?

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-26
Waiver of right of respondents Dwight Takeno, Ray Camacho, Eric Nagamine, David Forrest, and Hawai'i State Teachers Association to respond filed.
2019-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent Hawaii Labor Relations Board to respond filed.
2019-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2019)

Attorneys

Dwight Takeno, Ray Camacho, Eric Nagamine, David Forrest, and Hawai'i State Teachers Association
Scott A. KronlandAltshuler Berzon, LLP, Respondent
Scott A. KronlandAltshuler Berzon, LLP, Respondent
Hawaii Labor Relations Board
Clyde James WadsworthDept. of the Attorney General, State of Hawaii, Respondent
Clyde James WadsworthDept. of the Attorney General, State of Hawaii, Respondent
Stephanie Stucky, et al.
Shawn Anthony Luiz — Petitioner
Shawn Anthony Luiz — Petitioner