No. 18-1346
Dale E. Kleber v. CareFusion Corporation
Tags: age-discrimination circuit-split disparate-impact employment-law griggs-doctrine griggs-precedent griggs-v-duke-power hiring-practices job-applicants national-economy smith-v-city-of-jackson statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the text of section 4(a)(2) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protect outside job applicants, or does it apply only to incumbent employees applying for transfers and promotions?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the text of section 4(a)(2) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protect outside job applicants, as this Court held when interpreting language identical to section 4(a)(2) in Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971), or does section 4(a)(2) unambiguously apply only to incumbent employees applying for transfers and promotions, as the majority of a divided en banc Seventh Circuit held below? ii PARTIES The
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-16
Reply of petitioner Dale E. Kleber filed. (Distributed)
2019-06-27
Brief of respondent CareFusion Corporation in opposition filed.
2019-05-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 27, 2019.
2019-05-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 28, 2019 to June 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-04-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 28, 2019)
Attorneys
CareFusion Corporation
Dale E. Kleber
Laurie A. McCann — AARP Foundation Litigation, Petitioner
Laurie A. McCann — AARP Foundation Litigation, Petitioner