No. 18-5411

Subi Mehmeti v. Jofaz Transportation, Inc.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-protections constitutional-rights discrimination due-process employee-rights employment employment-discrimination family-medical-leave-act federal-laws fmla-rights health-condition medical-leave retaliation serious-health-condition workplace-retaliation
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA Securities
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was there a legal obligation for company Jofaz Transportation, Inc. under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to provide leave for an employee with a serious health condition?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : -lWas there a legal cbligation, company Jofaz Transportation, Inc.? Which is included according to the laws Employer "Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993" With a legal obligation the federal for a skilled worker, according to federal laws. For a heaith paralysis, supported. and protected. by federal laws, Protection for employees who . request leave or otherwise assert FMLA rights. ite in which of the federal laws is the company jofaz Transport, inc grounded? Denying federal, constitutional, legal rights of the employee? , Replacing legal rights with extreme disciplinary measures? : Because of a serious health condition that makes the employee incapable of performing the employee's work functions. tt ts it possible ta be disregarded the representative of the forensics in a trial, by a serious health condition invoiving continuing treatment by a health care provider, all under federal faw Articles? . . According to the constitution, alt equal are in-laws, without distinction employer-emptoyee. Js it passible to be denied me, rights constitutional federatlegat far judgment, when everything is based.on laws . . 1 .

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-05
Brief of respondent Jofaz Transportation, Inc. in opposition filed.
2018-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2018)

Attorneys

Jofaz Transportation, Inc.
Jamie Scott FelsenMilman Labuda Law Group PLLC, Respondent
Jamie Scott FelsenMilman Labuda Law Group PLLC, Respondent
Subi Mehmeti
Subi Mehmeti — Petitioner
Subi Mehmeti — Petitioner