Subi Mehmeti v. Jofaz Transportation, Inc.
Arbitration ERISA Securities
Was there a legal obligation for company Jofaz Transportation, Inc. under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to provide leave for an employee with a serious health condition?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : -lWas there a legal cbligation, company Jofaz Transportation, Inc.? Which is included according to the laws Employer "Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993" With a legal obligation the federal for a skilled worker, according to federal laws. For a heaith paralysis, supported. and protected. by federal laws, Protection for employees who . request leave or otherwise assert FMLA rights. ite in which of the federal laws is the company jofaz Transport, inc grounded? Denying federal, constitutional, legal rights of the employee? , Replacing legal rights with extreme disciplinary measures? : Because of a serious health condition that makes the employee incapable of performing the employee's work functions. tt ts it possible ta be disregarded the representative of the forensics in a trial, by a serious health condition invoiving continuing treatment by a health care provider, all under federal faw Articles? . . According to the constitution, alt equal are in-laws, without distinction employer-emptoyee. Js it passible to be denied me, rights constitutional federatlegat far judgment, when everything is based.on laws . . 1 .