Whether Appellate Court erred in denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration

QUESTIONS PRESENTED {, Whether Appellate Court erred in denying Appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the U.S. District Court ruling in issuing the granting of summary judgment and misapplied the ruling under McDonnell Douglas in finding that the Appellant did not provide sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find intentional discrimination? ll. Whether the Court properly considered Appellant’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment and evidence presented demonstrating that the federal government mislead the parties and the Court and whether the Court abused its discretion in failure to consider appellant’s uncontested evidence of pre-selection sufficient for a jury to . “reasonably disbelieve” appellee’s proffered reason? t