I.Is federal bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113, which can be accomplished by "intimidation" or "extortion" a crime of violence as defined in the force clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), if federal appellate courts have specifically held that intimidation can be implied and extortion can be carried out without the threat of violence?

II.What amount of force satisfies this Court's definition of "physical force", that is, force capable of causing physical pain or injury to another person as described in Johnson v. United States, 559 U.S. 133, 140 (2010)?

III. Did the Tenth Circuit incorrectly conclude that the element 'use of a dangerous weapon' in federal bank robbery always involves the threatened use of violent force when other circuits have found displaying, much less brandishing, a weapon is not necessary to commit the offense?

Is federal bank robbery a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)