No. 18-6644

Jingyuan Feng v. Sheena Komenda, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: adverse-employment-action employment-discrimination employment-discrimination,civil-rights,title-vii,p equal-employment performance-evaluation pretext retaliation title-vii
Key Terms:
EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2019-01-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the falsified employment performance statements are pretexts or legitimate reasons for the employment decisions

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the falsified employment performance statements are pretexts or legitimate reasons for the employment decisions. 2. Whether exceptionally placing an employee into discipline, not following employer's own discipline policy, is an equal and fair employment in a claim for discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 3. Whether the negative employment decision to start a discipline pathing to termination, based on the performance statements only 10 days after employee's verbal complaints and opposition to unequal employment treatments, is an adverse employment action in a claim for retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 4. Whether the employment termination, again based on the falsified performance statement, after employee's multiple complaints for the escalated unfair/unequal treatments due to discrimination and retaliation, is an adverse employment action in a claim for retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Docket Entries

2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-10
Waiver of right of respondent Rockwell Collins, Inc. to respond filed.
2018-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2018)

Attorneys

Jingyuan Feng
Jingyuan July Feng — Petitioner
Jingyuan July Feng — Petitioner
Rockwell Collins, Inc.
Eugene ScaliaGibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Respondent
Eugene ScaliaGibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Respondent