Whether the state's denial of petitioner's request for a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act violated petitioner's constitutional rights

Questions Presented [2-1AW 1% Pareaten Worle @tlew com an wagered aerten. contest aerating 44, Oo ee Deen ren thew Fo —_— , (Yeh, gout herr drtetwnsnt At candle bey soaerQtercnn tipi rtone omnk uneat per wudstel nesoornae i _ OE en ie ee oe Powe nepinicliing. anrd. dramas oj Tf: knineliion ~My in, 0! Shote Hoa pctel | Davclopamerkef San (() Our erana iy ne ICIP TORT ae Wn ey Werte to mole a qpeG. saeprecorene Bit ehh oAWOA tomer. pram 18% en we — neh 0 er Kk Aerraretry ameler otf aD em eth iced Avy che State of CA. te bate. _aneplamser. to werk under cheee 000 _ torditierns-Hour did dey get cumay with, tia a Ces, sresat oun cejuned) weer (oaparan effa Uhtin ajundien ot 7 Be Hewreran WGA aor — ) Questions Tresented oped) -| = (ie): Dry sma te tepten®Q oleal uceh ast ef theca td eof then, nortk Related orryerer 2 EP Wg dere oe ene wWunt Sto Lvaten ste thew — nek thew 7 . a BH) ng ta the cemgared wrorber the Luar t — (AD Why went a parson iors oon attormon son. AOMe * Than tien _ tend A Jaiae, thew lo asbl wan BP 145 Does yor Weak SE. > 2 nthe tense ela Moy boven (29) on rae wt werken 4a dhasnoarek _ —. tt) bthy 2a every mere Aeppervod asdet fot _ oe ae frovet = Pormaniat rn and Cher thad sompbeyor opti: WrynindeQ Ge) hy ta Ch run Life om Moder on Tog. oe Do preter aE ae a eee ge aaya” roams: Mos beans . List of Factias i. hea hk Cole BO. Bor 2A) Frsenot 0.937 %-0884 Z state Fund Po Bex 3'F1 Susun eidy, PMS E SCI 3. State o th./ Dept. of Developmental Services PO Box 944 20 2. San. CA. PO. BaK 7€2,4¢¢-20nr0 ; Q Mi. [E10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW [ ] For cases from federal courts: The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at