No. 19-549

Hannah P. v. Joseph Maguire, Acting Director, Office of the Director of National Intelligence

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-10-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: ada americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights conduct conduct-based-termination disability disability-discrimination employment employment-discrimination employment-law reasonable-accommodation rehabilitation-act
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-03-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an employment decision that is based on conduct caused by a qualified individual's disability is insulated from scrutiny under the federal disability discrimination statutes on the ground that the decision is not made on the basis of disability

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act generally prohibit employment discrimination against qualified individuals on the basis of disability. 29 U.S.C. § 794(a) and (d); 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a). In applying these federal disability discrimination statutes, the courts of appeals have disagreed with respect to the proper treatment of employment decisions that are based on conduct caused by an employee’s or applicant’s disability. In such cases, which arise with some frequency, the employer will typically contend that the plaintiff’s conduct—often labeled as “misconduct”—is conceptually distinct from the plaintiff’s underlying disability and thus provides a lawful, non-discriminatory basis for the employment action in question. In the decision below, the Fourth Circuit endorsed that purported distinction, which also finds support in the Fifth Circuit’s precedent. Four courts of appeals, however, have reached precisely the opposite conclusion. The question presented is whether an employment decision that is based on conduct caused by a qualified individual’s disability is insulated from scrutiny under the federal disability discrimination statutes on the ground that the decision is not made on the basis of disability. @

Docket Entries

2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-18
Reply of petitioner Hannah P. filed. (Distributed)
2020-01-31
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-12-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 31, 2020.
2019-12-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 30, 2019 to January 31, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 30, 2019.
2019-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 29, 2019 to December 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 29, 2019)
2019-09-18
Application (19A307) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 23, 2019.
2019-09-13
Application (19A307) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 23, 2019 to October 23, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Hannah P.
Mark Thomas StancilRobbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, Petitioner
Mark Thomas StancilRobbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent