No. 19-5881

Arthur O. Armstrong v. Virginia, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-09-10
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 4th-amendment civil-procedure civil-procedure-rule-60-b-6 constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment liberty property rule-60
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-11-08
Related Cases: 19-5886 (Vide) 19-5887 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any relief

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \ Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any relief. : Whether Petitioner was deprived of liberty and property without due process of law in violation of . the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Whether petitioner was deprived of liberty and/or property without due process of law. Whether Respondents violated petitioner's Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution to the United States. Whether petitioner is entitled to his constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

Docket Entries

2019-11-12
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Arthur O. Armstrong
Arthur O. Armstrong — Petitioner
Arthur O. Armstrong — Petitioner