No. 19-5886
Arthur O. Armstrong v. North Carolina, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-procedure-rule-60-b-6 conspiracy constitutional-rights due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment liberty probable-cause property rule-60
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief, pursuant to Rule 60 (b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief, pursuant to Rule 60 (b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Whether petitioner was deprived of liberty and property without due process of law in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Whether respondents acted in a conspiracy. : Whether there was ever probable cause. :
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Arthur O. Armstrong
Arthur O. Armstrong — Petitioner