Whether FINRA, an ostensibly private corporation invested with vast powers to regulate the securities industry, is absolutely immune from any claims arising out of tortious misconduct during a raid conducted at a private place of business

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether FINRA, an_ ostensibly private corporation invested with vast powers to regulate the securities industry, is absolutely immune from any claims arising out of tortious misconduct during a raid conducted at a private place of business. 2. Whether FINRA, by virtue of its close nexus with the federal government and the fact that it has been delegated extensive law enforcement powers, is a state actor for purposes of the Constitution. LIST OF ALL PARTIES TO PROCEEDINGS BELOW Plaintiffs: John J. Hurry, Justine Hurry, Investment Services Corp., Hurry Family Revocable Trust d/t/d October 18, 2011 amended November 26, 2012, Investment Services Partners LLC, Scottsdale Capital Advisors Partners LLC, SCAP I LLC, SCAP II LLC, SCAP III LLC, SCAP 4 LLC, SCAP 6 LLC, SCAP 7 LLC, SCAP 8 LLC, SCAP 9 LLC, SCAP 10 LLC, BRICFM LLC d/b/a Corner of Paradise Ice Cream Store, CJ3 LLC, Association of Securities Dealers LLC, SCAP 5 LLC, Investment Services Capital LLC, Investment Services Holdings Corp., NEWCONMGT LLC, ISC LLC, ISHC LLC, NEWMGT LLC, SCAINTL LLC, FLJH {00104473;2} ili LLC, ASD Holding Company LLC, and Hurry Foundation. Defendants: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., and Scott M. Andersen {00104473;2}