No. 19-6623
Mario Denane Fultz v. United States
Tags: intentional physical force or by intimidation' to include the use of violent criminal-law criminal-statutes federal-crimes federal-criminal-statutes federal-robbery-statutes force force-clause force-definition intentional-force legislative-intent physical-force statutory-construction statutory-interpretation violence violent-crime
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-12-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Congress intended the phrase 'by force and violence, or by intimidation' that appears in multiple federal criminal statutes to include the use of violent, intentional physical force
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Congress intended the phrase “by force and violence, or by intimidation,” that appears in multiple federal criminal statutes to include the use of violent, intentional physical force. prefix
Docket Entries
2019-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-11-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Mario Denane Fultz
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent