No. 19-6797
Hal Mark Kreitman v. United States
Tags: business-expenses business-services criminal-activity criminal-liability criminal-offense criminal-procedure employee-liability employee-services employment federal-jurisdiction legal-culpability money-laundering payment-structure
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does an employee's facilitation of a criminal offense, by providing services to a business engaged in criminal activity, make the employee guilty not only of the underlying criminal offense, but also of money laundering if the employer pays the employee or pays other ordinary business expenses?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does an employee's facilitation of a criminal offense, by providing services to a business engaged in criminal activity, make the employee guilty not of the underlying criminal offense, but also of money laundering if the employer pays the employee or pays other ordinary business expenses?
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 2, 2020)
2019-09-23
Application (19A302) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 25, 2019.
2019-09-11
Application (19A302) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 26, 2019 to November 25, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Hal Kreitman
Richard C. Klugh Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent