No. 19-6885
Antonio Escobar v. United States
Tags: alleyne-v-united-states criminal-law criminal-procedure drug-offenses drug-statute due-process flores-figueroa-v-united-states fourth-amendment mens-rea statutory-interpretation traffic-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the mens rea requirement in 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) applies to drug type and quantity
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, in light of Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), and Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013), and the Due Process Clause, the “knowingly or intentionally” mens rea contained in 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) applies to the offense elements of drug type and drug quantity found in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b). 2. Whether the Fourth Amendment standards for traffic stops articulated in Rodriguez v. United States, 135 8. Ct. 1609 (2015), apply to stops. i
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2020)
Attorneys
Antonio Escobar
Kathryn Shephard — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kathryn Shephard — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent