Whether petitioner was discharged from teaching position without due process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , 1. Whether School District of Philadelphia, on August 25, 1992, discharged the petitioner from his teaching position, without due process of law, without a hearing, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article B-VIN, Grievance Procedure of the collective bargaining agreement between the School District of Philadelphia and Federation of Teachers when respondent acted with active connivance in the making of the state law violation false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrimination to deprive appellant of property without due process of law. 2. Whether respondent Schoof District of Philadelphia, on November 18, 1994, denied the petitioner reinstatement to his teaching position without due Process of law, without a hearing, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article B-VIII. Grievance Procedure of the collective bargaining agreement between the School District of Philadelphia and the Federation of Teachers by arbitrary means when respondent denied the petitioner to speak at the hearing, or be heard when respondent acted with active connivance in the making of “Petitioner was afforded Article B-VIIl, Grievance Procedure false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrimination clearly sufficient to deprive petitioner of his job without due process of law. RECEIVED | MAY 2.0 2021 , ii : PROCEEDING and RELATED CASES All parties appear in the caption of the case are on the cover page RELATED CASES Armstrong vs. School District of Philadelphia, et al,. No. 2-99-cv-00825-H, United States District Court for the Eastern District Pennsylvania, judgment entered Apri 27, 2021. . Armstrong vs. School District of Philadelphia, et al, No. 21-8022, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Judgment entered May 5, 2021. Rule 26.1 Disclosure statement: There is no parent or publicly held company owning 10% or more of the corporate stock. . TABLE OF CONTENT Question